Medicaid Savings: Good Idea, But Illinoisans Missing the Main Opportunity
States across the country are wrestling with budget crises. In that context attention always turns to Medicaid, just because it is a large budget line, and it is therefore an attractive mark for anti-tax advocates who do not really have viable alternatives to taxes but like to speak vaguely about cutting spending. The Illinois budget mess offers a lesson in why these folks have the germ of a good idea but are missing the most promising way to achieve it.
Most knowledgeable people concede that there is no way out of the huge Illinois budget deficit but to raise revenues. Of course, many of those same people do not support raising the necessary revenues. The opponents disingenuously cry out that Illinois must never increase revenues until it has made “cuts” to the spending side. Tellingly, they have been unwilling or unable to specify exactly where they would cut the billions needed to balance the budget without increased revenues. Accountability is not their strong suit.
But there is nevertheless an interesting modest overlap between this “cuts” position of the opponents of revenue increases, and the position of the proponents. Led by the Governor, the proponents are committed to making reductions in state spending, as part of the overall budget package that includes the revenue increases. Greater efficiency is always a good and desired goal, and it is even more important in such difficult times. Moreover, revenue increases are more palatable, more fair, if state government is making efficiency improvements at the same time.
So both sides are focusing on ideas for cuts. One of the centers of attention for this kind of brainstorming is all of the state’s publicly supported health care coverages, popularly lumped together under the term “Medicaid”. The programs cover children, low income working parents, people with disabilities, and the elderly. The opponents of revenues, citing old and sloppily done consultants’ reports, say that Illinois could be saving $1 billion or more on Medicaid, mostly by imposing hardcore HMO-style managed care, insisting that people use generic instead of costly brand name drugs, and caring for more people in the community instead of nursing homes. The proponents of revenues, citing actual experience in Illinois that shows the state is already realizing significant savings from care management, generic drugs, and community based care, say that they are willing to try any reasonable new ideas, but estimate savings in the tens of millions. The fact is that Illinois is already among the lowest in per person Medicaid expenditures.
Both sides are missing the most likely source of significant Medicaid savings that will neither limit coverage nor impair care. It is not a Springfield initiative, but a Washington DC initiative that will get this done. As should be obvious, Medicaid is just one part of the larger health care system, most of which is in the private sector. Medicaid suffers from the same system-wide phenomena that are driving the dizzying upward spiral of health care costs for all of us – profiteering across the board, inefficiencies, lack of focus on prevention, loss of consumer choice and control, and so forth. It is this increase in cost, decrease in control, and loss of peace of mind that is driving the anger in the American people that in turn is driving the move towards comprehensive reform being led by President Obama.
These problems in the larger health care system fuel the trend in Medicaid spending. Thankfully, every year Medicaid spending (known as Medicaid “liabilities”) grows at a rate that is smaller than the overall consumer price index for medical related goods and services. Medicaid is a more efficient system. Yet Medicaid costs are necessarily directly related to the larger health system market. When health care costs go up generally, they also go up for Medicaid.
All those folks in Springfield looking for ways to spend less on Medicaid should realize that they are looking in the wrong town. The action on this is in Washington, where the battle over comprehensive reform is playing out right now. Just a couple of days ago, President Obama asked Congress to produce ideas for overall health system reforms to bring down the cost of care, or at least the rate of growth of the cost of care. He noted that in so doing, they would also be helping to produce $200-300 billion in savings for Medicare and Medicaid.
For those truly interested in controlling the growth in Medicaid spending, the most promising course is to help make sure that the drive for national comprehensive health care reform is successful this year. Meanwhile, the Springfield folks should tend to the knitting and vote for the revenues needed to fund state government.
